![]() ![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() Startseite > Lehre und Prüfungen > Literatur Evolutionspsychologie Debatte 2000 Literatur Evolutionspsychologie Debatte 2000Für die am 13.6.02 geplante Diskussion "Evolutionspsychologie: Testbar oder nicht?" im Kolloquium stehen folgende Texte als Downloads zur Verfügung:Der Leitartikel (unbedingt lesen!): Kommentare: Caporael, L. R., & Brewer, M. B. (2000). Metatheories, evolution, and psychology: Once more with feeling. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 23-26. [Caporael2000.pdf] Fiddick, L. (2000). The content of their discontent: How do the folk interpret evolutionary psychology? Psychological Inquiry, 11, 26-29. [Fiddick2000.pdf] Fletcher, G. J. O. (2000). Evaluating scientific theories. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 29-31. [Fletcher2000.pdf] Haig, B. D., & Durrant, R. (2000). Theory evaluation in evolutionary psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 34-38. [Haig2000.pdf Holcomb, H. R., III. (2000). Lakatos meets evolutionary psychology, or does he? Psychological Inquiry, 11, 38-42. [Holcomb2000.pdf] Miller, G. (2000). How to keep our metatheories adaptive: Beyond Cosmides, Tooby, and Lakatos. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 42-49. [Miller2000.pdf] Richardson, R. C. (2000). Epicycles and explanations in evolutionary psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 46-49. [Richardson2000.pdf] Schaller, M., & Conway, L. G. I. (2000). The illusion of unfalsifiability and why it matters. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 49-52. [Schaller2000.pdf] Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). A call to recognize the breadth of evolutionary perspectives: Sociocultural theories and evolutionary psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 52-55. [Wood2000.pdf] Erwiderung der Autoren: zurück zum Kolloquium zur Allgemeinen und Theoretischen Psychologie
|
||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|